Liron is very bright and articulates his arguments very well. I would compare him to someone like John Mearsheimer because he is to the future of AI as John is to international relations (IR).
It’s my contention that both of them should be interested in my “course” because while both of them tend to stay in their lanes neither one of them have stepped back and looked at the root of the problems they’re addressing. And in my opinion if you don’t examine the root of a problem you’re perpetually condemned to talking about the symptoms of the problem rather than getting at the solution to the problem. On a macro level, this is in large part why we’re in so much trouble as a species and rather than making AI part of the solution, because of our foolishness, it will most likely be the cause of our demise.
Liron is very bright and articulates his arguments very well. I would compare him to someone like John Mearsheimer because he is to the future of AI as John is to international relations (IR).
It’s my contention that both of them should be interested in my “course” because while both of them tend to stay in their lanes neither one of them have stepped back and looked at the root of the problems they’re addressing. And in my opinion if you don’t examine the root of a problem you’re perpetually condemned to talking about the symptoms of the problem rather than getting at the solution to the problem. On a macro level, this is in large part why we’re in so much trouble as a species and rather than making AI part of the solution, because of our foolishness, it will most likely be the cause of our demise.
Thanks for the comment but pls don't mention your course again or I block for spam
Oh - OK - Sorry.
I am interested in hearing more about the course that addresses the solution instead of the symptoms like Liron & other doomers.